Politics

Antiquated Espionage Act toothless against Wikileaks, Democrats say

Jeff Winkler Contributor
Font Size:

Top House Democrats struggled Wednesday to find legal avenues by which the United States could prosecute WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, saying the Espionage Act’s antiquated and sweeping language distorts several key differences involving sensitive material, rendering it toothless in the Internet age.

A congressional committee hearing Thursday investigated the implications of prosecuting the organizations that have publicly released thousands of classified cables over the past year including the most recent dump of exchanges between diplomats.

Panel Chairman Democratic Rep. John Conyers set the tone of the hearing saying that “prosecuting WikiLeaks would raise the most fundamental questions about free speech, about who is a journalist and what citizens can know about their government.”

Other Representatives were equally concerned about any prosecution under the current Espionage Act.

“What Wikileaks did was illegal,” said Virginia Democratic Rep. Bobby Scott. “We have been agonizing over this.” Scott, however, stressed that “we need to take our time and get [legislation] right.”

Virginia Republican Rep. Bob Goodlatte was much more clear in expressing the panel’s frustration with trying to find a way to punish Wikileaks and Assange.

“I’m looking for practical ways to solve the problem… for us to legislatively reassert our authority,” he said.

The expert witnesses before the Committee on the Judiciary panel generally agreed with Conyers, saying that any prosecution under the current Espionage Act would raise a variety of legal questions for news organizations as well as threaten basic 1st Amendment rights. Instead, the experts called for an overhaul of the Espionage Act of 1917 in order to reflect the changing information-sharing landscape.

“Spying (or real espionage), disclosure of national defense information and mishandling of classified information … should be set out in separate provisions of the law, each that clearly defines the offense it seeks to address,” said Abbe D. Lowell, a lawyer with the McDermott, Will and Emery firm.

“The Espionage Act of 1917 was designed and intended to deal with classic acts of espionage,” said Stephen I. Vladeck. Like the other witnesses at the panel, the American University Professor of Law suggested several changes to solve the “uncertainty surrounding the Act’s applicability in the present context.”

Both witnesses and committee members said the current amount of classified material is far too much and called for narrowing the standards for what the U.S. government retains and deems “classified.”

Conyers said he expected the next judicial committee under Republican leadership to pursue revisions of the Espionage Act.

A spokesperson for the Judiciary Committee’s Republicans said Chairman-elect Lamar Smith “wants to ensure that the Espionage Act conforms to modern day technologies and will work with the Justice Department to determine whether a legislative fix is necessary.”

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel