Politics

TheDC Analysis: Obama unleashes ultimate inter-agency turf war in sprawling bureaucracy

Photo of Jonathan Strong
Jonathan Strong
Contributor
  • See All Articles
  • Send Email
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Bio

      Jonathan Strong

      Jonathan Strong, 27, is a reporter for the Daily Caller covering Congress. Previously, he was a reporter for Inside EPA where he wrote about environmental regulation in great detail, and before that a staffer for Rep. Dan Lungren (R-CA). Strong graduated from Wheaton College (IL) with a degree in political science in 2006. He is a huge fan of and season ticket holder to the Washington Capitals hockey team. Strong and his wife reside in Arlington.

President Obama is vowing to reorganize the federal agencies that make up the executive branch for the first time in “half a century,” according to material released by the White House and the President’s prepared remarks for the State of the Union.

Obama says the plan will “merge, consolidate, and reorganize the federal government in a way that best serves the goal of a more competitive America.”

Maybe. Here’s another vision: this will become the ultimate inter-agency turf war, a morass of bureaucratic infighting.

As Obama notes in his speech, the federal agencies often draw ridiculous lines separating their jurisdictions. “The Interior Department is in charge of salmon while they’re in fresh water, but the Commerce Department handles them in when they’re in saltwater. And I hear it gets even more complicated once they’re smoked,” Obama says.

One of the reasons for these strict lines is that bureaucrats tend to defend their fiefdoms as fiercely as a mother grizzly defends her cubs.

For instance, Obama came into power hoping to significantly reduce the number of federal agencies regulating financial markets. Myriad agencies regulate different, and sometimes the same, parts of the markets, and Obama had hoped to unite many of them under the same banner.

But as the Wall Street Journal reported on June 9, 2009, the administration ditched the plan upon realizing the scale of the inter-agency turf war it would spur on.

This occurred at the beginning of Obama’s four-year term at the apex of his power.

Now consider the same effort applied across the entire federal government as the clock ticks towards the 2012 presidential election.

Bureaucrats, man your battle stations!

  • adair

    The interdepartmental turf fights won’t matter much. They’ll all have to give donations to him anyway. That can’t possibly be prohibited by the Hatch Act. And if it is, well, the Dems have a way of ignoring rules and regulations.

  • g55rumpy

    or as convoluted as the nazi government

  • RetAF

    Thanks to so-called health care and financial reform bills passed last year, the executive has huge new powers to regulate aspects of private citizens’ lives. Including new agencies to monitor gold transactions and track individuals debt and purchases.

    And I have a feeling Obama’s leadership style comes from the Stalin school. Keep your underlings fighting amongst themselves and give them vague and competing goals to reduce efficiency. I’ve worked for people like that before – and in the chaos that results there’s a total loss of accountability.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention TheDC Analysis: Obama unleashes ultimate inter-agency turf war in sprawling bureaucracy | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment -- Topsy.com

  • russ311

    Rearrange the deckchairs… again?

  • jaydubyagee

    why not, worked great at DHS

  • Swen

    I’ve a feeling Obama’s experience with salmon is much like mine. They’re very good smoked, but hard to keep lit….