The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

To win the White House, look to the statehouses

Rod Pennington
Author, A Family Reunion

Here’s a tip for Republicans who would like to see a new occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue two years from now. Don’t look to Washington for your next standard bearer; look to the statehouses. Since 1956 nine sitting presidents have run for re-election (I’m including Lyndon Johnson and Gerald Ford, both of whom weren’t actually elected to their first terms). Three were defeated while six were successful in securing a second term.

Presidents who lost re-election
Pres. George H. W. Bush lost to Gov. Bill Clinton
Pres. Jimmy Carter lost to Gov. Ronald Reagan
Pres. Gerald Ford lost to Gov. Jimmy Carter

Presidents who won re-election
Pres. George W. Bush defeated Sen. John Kerry
Pres. Clinton defeated Sen. Robert Dole
Pres. Reagan defeated VP Fritz Mondale
Pres. Nixon defeated Sen. George McGovern
Pres. Lyndon Johnson defeated Sen. Barry Goldwater
Pres. Dwight Eisenhower defeated Sen. Adlai Stevenson

Do you detect a pattern here? In the past 55 years, presidents running for re-election were 0-3 when their opponent was a governor and 6-0 when they were up against another Washington insider.

While members of the U.S. Senate never seem to suffer from any self-esteem issues, when it comes to making them president, voters don’t share their enthusiasm. When given a choice of a United States senator or anyone else, only once in American history — in the 1920 race between Sen. Warren G. Harding and Gov. James Cox — have the people chosen the senator. Sure, Sen. Kennedy won in 1960, but that’s like all of Barry Bonds’ home run records; there is an asterisk attached. If the dad of Pres. Obama’s current chief of staff, Chicago Mayor Bill Daley, hadn’t spent election night digging up voters from the local cemeteries, Nixon would have won Illinois and the election. In 2008 we elected only our third senator in 56 presidential elections; but again the game was rigged. Both of the major parties had nominated candidates from the Senate, so everyone was stuck with a Hobson’s choice. It makes you wonder how Pres. Obama might have fared against an energetic Washington outsider instead of a tired and listless Sen. McCain, who was short on ideas and passion.

The good news for Republicans is that they have a deep bench of well-qualified governors to challenge President Obama in 2012.

The Best of the best

Gov. Mitch Daniels of Indiana

Strengths: He is a great chief executive with White House experience as the director of the Office of Management and Budget under Bush II and his solution to healthcare reform is far better than Obamacare.

Weaknesses: He is a poor public speaker and doesn’t appear to have the “Fire in the Belly” for a bruising presidential run. His recent reaction to the Indiana legislature’s attempt to let Indiana be a “right-to-work” state will trouble many Republicans.

Former Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota

Strengths: He has been a successful governor from an important swing state.

Weaknesses: Poor speaker but getting better. He is tracking badly in Iowa and, being the governor of an adjoining state, anything less than a win in the Iowa caucus would be a disaster.

Former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts

Strengths: Successful “blue” state governor and huge name recognition.

Weakness: While he may be the best November candidate the Republicans have, his flip-flop on abortion and his passage of healthcare reform in Massachusetts could be deal breakers in the primaries.

  • cowboybob

    I always thought Mitch Daniels would be a good president. Boring but good. After the way he caved to the unions over “right to work” then started backpedeling so fast he pulled a hamstring, has really given me second thoughts about him.

    I agree with her royal highness Princess12, that Christie line was a classic.

  • Princess12

    I love this line about Chris Christie: Heck, the Democrats in New Jersey might vote for him just to get him out of Trenton.

    Hilarious and probably true.

  • cindylou

    To say Sarah Palin is the only top tier Republican who could not beat Obama in the general election is absurd. She may be the best candidate around. She is certainly the most interesting!

    • Princess12

      Maybe she could get Tina Fey to run as her VP!

    • jmk1502

      Palin certainly is the most interesting. A self-absorbed, crazed religious idiot. The only problem is, Palin is not a sitting Gov. She QUIT and left the position which she was elected to so she could pursue $$$. And cry about being the victim, when she is obviously in the public square and fair game.

  • Mike666

    Gee, why did the GOP run McCain in 2008?

    • jmk1502

      The GOP ran McCain in 2008 because that codgy old geezer had the best chance of winning, and would have had a much better chance if he hadn’t made the monumental mistake of choosing Palin as his VP. Those 30% on the far-right fringe are really deluded if they believe the Quitter Palin would stand a chance in 2012. But please nominate her, GOP. Please.