The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

The truth about America’s oil & gas companies — Part II

This is the second piece in a two-part series. To see the first piece, click here.

The United States oil and natural gas industry does not receive taxpayer-subsidized payments.

Given the recent publicity surrounding this issue, this statement may come as a surprise, yet it is 100 percent true. Also true is that the industry pays more than $86 million to the government every single day and has an effective income tax rate of 41 percent. Why then have so many readily bought the notion that the taxpayers are supporting this highly profitable industry?

A fundamental pillar of the U.S. income tax system is that businesses are taxed only on net income. This means that there needs to be some practical method for businesses to recover costs. There are many tax code provisions that allow companies to recover their costs, but tax deductions and cost recovery mechanisms should in no way be confused with subsidies.

For example, many inaccurately classify the ability to recover costs associated with drilling a well as some sort of unique subsidy for the industry. When companies drill, they incur intangible drilling costs, such as site preparation, labor, engineering and design. These “intangible” costs associated with drilling a well usually represent 60-80 percent of the cost of the well. Independent producers can deduct 100 percent of these costs in the year they occur while larger, non-independent companies can deduct 70 percent of the costs in year one and amortize the remainder over five years.

This is the same treatment afforded many different types of taxpayers. Small businesses can expense 100 percent of certain equipment costs and mining companies can deduct mine development costs. Further, research and development (R&D) costs incurred by industries such as biotech, pharmaceutical and software firms can be immediately expensed.

As is the case with research and development, oil and gas development is no sure thing. Despite great advances in technology, drilling a well is the only means to determine the actual presence of hydrocarbons in reservoir rock or sand. And when companies drill, they often rely on new and innovative methods. While these methods have led to the recovery of domestic reserves few thought possible a decade ago, they remain, essentially risky ventures.

Deductions allowed for the U.S. oil and natural gas industry are often more restrictive when compared with other industries. For example, in 2004, Congress enacted the Section 199 Domestic Manufacturers Deduction to spur job creation and retention for all businesses that grow, extract, produce and manufacture goods in the United States. Contrary to assertions, this is not a deduction unique to oil and natural gas manufacturing. It applies to all qualifying industries, from newspapers to home builders, electric companies to movie studios and — logically — oil and gas companies.

For most U.S. manufacturers, the deduction is 9 percent of their domestic net income. However, recent legislation has already penalized U.S. oil and natural gas companies by freezing their deduction at 6 percent.

  • Pingback: Big Oil Does Not Receive Government Subsidies | Timothy J. Hammons

  • dhmlco

    “Those who argue that oil and natural gas companies are not entitled to the same tax considerations available to other industries…”

    So you want the same tax considerations as all other industries? Works for me. So that means we can eliminate the special exemption from the passive loss limitation rules that apply to all other industries? Great. That will save the US government $1.1 billion a year.

    Sounds to me like the percentage depletion allowance can go too. If I own a store, I don’t get to take an extra 15% deduction as my goods are sold (used up). That’s another billion.

    How about applying the same exact rules that every other business plays by regarding active vs. passive income for investors? Or dropping the “preference item” status on the AMT for excess intangible drilling costs? Standardized severance taxes? And on, and on.

    No other industry in America can compete with the smorgasbord of tax breaks that are available to the oil and gas industry. As such, you’re absolutely right.

    It’s time everyone — including the oil and gas industry — played on a level field.

  • Pingback: Oil Industry and Subsidies

  • Pingback: The truth about America’s oil & gas companies — Part II « Mb50's "Liquid Mud" Blog

  • SolipsisticToo

    Simply amazing. How could they generate record profits while being treated so badly? I’m so glad someone is standing up and defending the industry. All the shareholders appreciate your courage.

    • Landrew

      It’s amusing to see the claims of record oil company profits appearing in the media routinely going back every single year. Can you cite them, or are you just repeating talking points? I looked at Exxon’s Income Statements for 2010 (you know what those are, right??). They had 383B revenues. 28.5B in Sales taxes and 36B in Other taxes and duties. (Both operating expenses passed on to the consumer, BTW). Net income before taxes was 53B, Income Taxes was 22.5B (42%), so a Net Income of 30.5B. About 8% margin.

      This was all considerably higher than 2009, but far less than 2006-2008. So they made 30B, the government(s) they paid taxes and duties to made 87B. Looks to me like the government is the one making record profits.