The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
 Maybe Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad maintains that awful mustache so no one thinks he's a lady?  

Branstad calls Iowa race ‘wide open,’ encourages candidates to campaign in the state

Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad today issued an open call to presidential candidates to come campaign in his state, calling the race for the first-in-the-nation caucus “wide open,” in the wake of Mike Huckabee’s decision not to run.

Huckabee won the Iowa caucus with 35 percent of the vote last year, which, Branstad pointed out, means “that 35 percent is up for grabs.”

“This is wide open,” said Branstad at the press conference, calling it “a great opportunity” for other candidates.

Several candidates have so far stayed out of Iowa, which is getting something of a reputation as a state that only a hardcore social conservative can win. After a disappointing loss to Huckabee in 2008, Romney has not yet made a trip to the state. Huntsman’s campaign has suggested that he will not bother to campaign there.

But Branstad said “it’s not too late” for these candidates to start campaigning in Iowa.

“The straw poll is 89 days away,” he said, referring to the influential Ames Straw Poll on August 13, and calling that plenty of time for a candidate to “catch fire.”

He also pointed out that the Ames Straw Poll is “not the end all and be all.” That, he said, is the Iowa Caucuses. But he insisted that the straw poll is important.

Branstad also predicted a “bigger turnout” than ever, citing “growing interest.”

The press conference was in many ways as much of a response to a column published today in the Des Moines Register (and also appeared in the New Hampshire Union Leader) by Fergus Cullen, the former chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party. The column contended that Iowa was losing clout in the election process by allowing more extreme elements of the Republican Party, especially social conservatives and evangelicals, to take up most of the political air space. He argued that it makes candidates think that only a social conservative has a chance in the state, causing some candidates to not campaign there at all.

“It’s hard to talk about real issues when three quarters of the audience wears tinfoil hats,” wrote Cullen.

Branstad said that he was not alarmed by the column.

“I think he’s out of touch,” he said.

“I’ve never seen a person here with a silver hat in my whole life,” he joked.

“I think we’ll prove him wrong,” he continued. “I know that Iowans are very intelligent, thoughtful and open minded.”

Branstad said his advice to candidates was to “go to all 99 counties, do town hall meetings, meet with people, and answer their questions,” emphasizing the necessity of retail politics in the state.

“People really want to look at your policy and your stands and what you’re going to do and focus on,” he said. The major issues he pointed to were “cleaning up the financial mess” and “jobs.”

“Sounds like a truce on social issues,” said one reporter. “You didn’t mention one social issue.”

“You know where I stand on social issues,” responded Branstad, pointing to his support of a bill in the legislature to ban late term abortions. “But,” he added, perhaps in a nod to potential candidate Mitch Daniels, “I also know that jobs and getting the financial mess straightened out is critical to the economic survival of our country.”

  • kemo sabe

    what he’s really encouraging is more pandering to iowans with increased farm subsidies, ethanol subsidies and other wasteful spending.

    there’s a reason iowa fights tooth and nail to hold america’s first caucus.

  • JBLayne

    Why doesn’t Branstad run for President? My problem with all of these guys is that none of them seem to be veterans, and I want someone who thought enough about the U.S. to serve his country to be President. Branstad has. As a bonus, he didn’t go to Yale or Harvard.

  • virginiagentleman

    Branstad and Iowa are in need of your money, candidates, and want you to come and spend lots of it in Iowa! And be sure to visit(spend money) in all 99 counties! Really? The only caucus worth its salt is the November,2011 elections. All the rest, while they do provide some exposure for candidates, is simply a cash cow for the states holding them. Can you come up with ANY examples of concrete policy being discussed? No? But we hear the same old platitudes, the same tired stump speechs, the same tired promises, all of which are tinted with slander against their percieved opponents. But hey, by all means, visit every county in every state! God knows, they need the money!…..When the candidates start listing their policies and views, etched in stone, rather than in attacks and empty platitudes, maybe I’ll pay attention then. In the meantime, the list of folks I’m interested in have websites, work and political histories, books(really now, what candidate doesn’t a book out); in other words, lots of research material out there. Why listen to a talking head when I can do my own research?

    • 8second.ride

      “in need of your money, candidates, and want you to come and spend lots of it in Iowa! And be sure to visit(spend money) in all 99 counties! Really?”

      And that’s wrong why?

      • virginiagentleman

        Not wrong, cowboy, just the way it’s done. It’s the same old dog and pony show, nothing new. Let the candidates spend as much as they can in Iowa. I’m sure the good citizens of Iowa can find good use for those campaign dollars! My point, 8second.ride, is that Branstad is using Huckabee’s dropping out as a way to get more dollars for his state, nothing more, nothing less. For Iowa it may be a good source of revenue. The same for the handful of other states that do it. You’ll hear the same talking points at every stop. Again, nothing new here. Any chance that you are from Iowa?

  • borntoraisehogs

    The disproportionate influence of the Hawk-Eye Cauci has led us to where we are today.