The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Weak tea in Kentucky

Rick Robinson
Author, Writ of Mandamus

This week’s gubernatorial primary election in Kentucky produced all of the excitement of a three-hour Joe Biden dissertation on nuclear non-proliferation. And, while there may be some comic value to hearing Biden speak for any length of time, yesterday’s poll results in the Commonwealth should be no laughing matter for Tea Party faithful.

Only one year ago, Rand Paul rolled to victory in the Bluegrass State on a tidal wave of Tea Party-brewed enthusiasm. Paul’s election was marked by streets lined with yard signs and mailboxes filled to capacity with campaign flyers. Voters who would usually be considered outside the universe of regular primary participants flocked to the polls in record numbers.

This past week, it was deadly quiet in Kentucky. Only a few fliers landed in homes. “For Sale” signs outnumbered campaign signs. A casual observer driving through Kentucky would have been hard-pressed to determine that an election was even on the horizon.

The lack of candidate activity was reflected in the final vote tally. The 9% turnout in Kentucky’s Republican gubernatorial primary reflects the apathy that was present in the state prior to last year’s electoral Rand-slide.

If Tuesday had been the Kentucky Derby, the recap of the race for the horse named “Tea Party” would state “failed to rally.”

What happened?

The primary was a three-way affair. The leader of the Kentucky Senate, David Williams, paired up with the Commissioner of Agriculture (and University of Kentucky basketball legend) Richie Farmer. The Tea Party got behind Louisville businessman Phil Moffett. Jefferson County Clerk Bobbie Holsclaw, who is a former aid to Senator Bob Dole, rounded out the field.

Williams ran a traditional campaign, bus touring the state while taking full advantage of his running mate’s legendary hoops status. They raised lots of money, sent out direct mail and went up on television. Williams might be the best stump speaker in America and he uses his talents well.

The folks who had started Rand Paul mania got behind Phil Moffett early, but that is where Moffett’s similarities with Kentucky’s junior senator ended. His campaign never really caught fire.

Moffett has a pleasant personality — a fresh face with business experience and new ideas. He would be a great dinner guest.

Unfortunately for the campaign, Phil Moffett did not have the political zip of Rand Paul. You had to search hard to find the name of his running mate on the campaign website.

Money did not flow and the campaign never gathered sufficient grassroots momentum to make a move. The turnout numbers tell the story. Those who identify themselves as Tea Partiers either voted for the establishment Republican, or more likely than not, stayed home.

Holsclaw and Moffett combined to keep the Williams-Farmer ticket under 50%, but there are no moral victories in politics. There are only winners and losers. On Tuesday, the establishment candidate won and the Tea Party candidate lost.

  • Marcus Carey

    I’ve been a Goldwater conservative since, ….well….Nixon-Lodge. And in that time frame I have watched as the GOP, at least in my little neck of the woods, has gone from being the liberty loving, small government, lower taxes, fiscal conservative outsiders to the party of prominence. Our area of Kentucky is now very securely republican.

    But along that trail we began to behave much like the iron fisted good old boy network of democrats we started out trying to unseat. In the beginning ours was the party which provided a chance for new blood, and new voices to enter the political debate. The democrats ran a closed shop. Only their hand picked, groomed team players were given a shot at elected office. And only democrats won, we always lost.

    But now that the GOP is the party in power, the establishment has little time for the old principles upon which we originally stood. It seems much more dedicated to developing strategies designed to keep the insiders in power, a repulsive resemblance to the old democrat machine.

    The TEA party is filled with the same kind of enthusiasm which was at the core of our GOP 50 years ago. It advocates a philosophy much more like Goldwater’s than what the mainstream advocates. As such the movement has great potential, but what it lacks is not only experience, but focus.

    I know many TEA party members. I spend a lot of time with them. I too could be considered a TEA partier. But, there is no party. In order to become relevant, they either must form a separate party or decide which one of the other two they will seek to work within.

    The idea that they can effectuate change by “voting for the man”, or not voting at all, is a sign of immaturity, but that’s not all. A significant number of TEA party folks are so “anti-government” that they are rabid disestablishmentarians, closer to the philosophy of revolutionary anarchists than constitutionalists.

    They will proudly stand for the pledge of allegiance, but have no time for anybody who suggests that they could do more with what they’ve got if they would listen to what they are saying in that pledge and realize that ours is a “republic” which means that we must work with our representatives to create change, or learn how to use the election process to replace them.

    You make a great point, but the Rove example will certainly tick a bunch of them off. Yes they need help, and yes they need experienced hands on deck, but first they need to get a grip and realize that “my way or the highway” is not a very effective mission statement.

  • Tex Expatriate

    Robinson may have made the case for a “seasoned political professional” but he did not make a case for a guy like Karl Rove. Rove did more damage to America than anyone other than Barack Obama by helping get George W. Bush elected. Bush, a liberal in a conservative suit, damaged conservatism as well, setting the stage for an Obama victory.