The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

NYC judge allows lawsuit against Huffington Post

NEW YORK (AP) — A judge on Tuesday refused to throw out a lawsuit by two Democratic political consultants who allege that The Huffington Post’s founders stole the idea for the online news website from them.

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Charles E. Ramos denied a motion by lawyers for the media company to dismiss the lawsuit, meaning that the case will now likely move to the discovery phase of fact-finding by both sides.

Consultants Peter Daou and James Boyce sued in November 2010, alleging they had originally come up with the plan for the site’s blend of blogs by prominent contributors, news aggregation and original content.

Daou and Boyce said they discussed their plans with Huffington Post co-founders Arianna Huffington and Kenneth Lerer in 2004, and believed they were partners. The two consultants claimed they were cut out of the deal after the co-founders raised millions of dollars to launch and develop the site. They seek unspecified damages.

When the lawsuit was filed, Huffington and Lerer said in a statement that the claims were “pure fantasy.”

AOL Inc. purchased The Huffington Post for $315 million in February.

On Tuesday, AOL Huffington Post Media Group spokesman Mario Ruiz said in statement that although the judge did not throw out the plaintiffs’ claims as they had requested, “we remain confident that we will prevail in proving that the lawsuit has no merit.”

An attorney for the plaintiffs, Partha P. Chattoraj, said the defense team was grateful for the opportunity to make its case to the judge.

“We look forward to proceeding with discovery, as the court ordered,” he said.

  • rick57

    And the liberals always say greedy republicans. With any luck we can get all the lib web sites and news casts (HA HA) to sue each other out of existience. You know make george soros start all over again spend billions more. WOW what an idea!!!!

  • Realist4U

    No problem! None of em believe in capitalism anyway!

  • Old Timer

    Two idiots hoping to milk a dead cow! There is nothing aside from original content that may exist on that site or any other site that could in anyway be considered original to the extent patentable or even copyrightable. Similar sites have existed since the very dawn of the Internet. In truth, AOL would have to be considered 100% stupid for having paid 100′s of millions for it. They would have been just as well off hiring a couple of geeky high school kids create a like site.

  • wagnert in atlanta

    Lord, they’re fighting over the credit for the Huffington Post? That’s like suing for the patent on cholera.