The National Education Association’s early endorsement of President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election bid has sparked speculation about what motivated the nation’s biggest teachers’ union.
Some experts speculate the premature endorsement may be a sign that the NEA is terrified. The union has just witnessed a slew of school choice victories and experts surmised it could be a confirmation of the union’s increasingly weak political position across the country. (THE TWEET BEAT: White House uses Twitter to get aggressive with critics)
Sarah Longwell of the Center for Union Facts told The Daily Caller the union normally would’ve forced a candidate to give into more demands before handing out an endorsement. But, faced with what Longwell describes as a “losing PR battle,” the NEA needed national help now.
“They could have held out and won some concessions from the administration, which has been, admittedly a little hard on teachers’ unions,” Longwell said, adding that Education Secretary Arne Duncan hasn’t “seen eye to eye” with the unions on lots of policies.
“Right now, they [teachers’ unions] are so under attack from Republican governors across the country that they feel like they need the [Obama] administration now more than ever.”
Longwell points specifically to the NEA caving on its adamant opposition of teacher evaluations based on students’ performance. Longwell said the union now agrees to support the idea, even though it won’t agree to any existing evaluation metrics.
“That to me was the crazy thing. That was the huge break,” Longwell said of how the NEA now agrees to support student-performance-based teacher evaluations. “They have never said anything like that before.”
Cato Institute education policy expert Neal McCluskey thinks the NEA may be hoping for political favors from Duncan if and when he starts handing out waivers from No Child Left Behind regulations. Duncan said recently that he’d consider waivers for certain parts of the program if it doesn’t receive full funding soon, but wouldn’t give any specifics as to how the Department of Education would go about giving them out.
“My take is that they’re trying to get behind Obama early, get on his good side, and then hope Secretary Duncan comes out and issues waivers from No Child Left Behind that are connected to things that they like,” McCluskey said, adding that it’s a possibility too that the timing of NEA’s endorsement might be simply because of its scheduled meeting.
McCluskey also said “I do think that this signifies a much-weakened National Education Association largely because the Obama administration tends to agree with a lot of Republicans that the unions are generally a problem.”