The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Obama focuses on 2013 debt ceiling goal

Neil Munro
White House Correspondent

The default deadline is just days away, and frustrated Democrats are rallying around a core demand: They want a debt extension large enough to avoid another painful debate prior to the 2012 election.

But GOP leaders, including House Speaker John Boehner, have focused on a short-term increase, partly because that would help them win support from caucus members who are already loath to approve more government overspending. (RELATED: White House, Republicans spar over length of debt limit increase)

One possible Boehner plan would seek $1 trillion in extra debt in exchange for $1 trillion in 10-year spending cuts. That would fund government until early 2012.

Democrats have already backed away from earlier demands for an unconditional debt increase, from their initial demand for $1.2 trillion in tax increases, and then from a demand for a “big deal” that would boost President Barack Obama’s credentials as a D.C. consensus builder.

They are, however, still demanding a $2.4 trillion debt increase that would fund government programs until after the 2012 election.

Administration officials pushed that particular budget deal on the Sunday talk shows; White House flacks promoted it via Twitter, and Democratic Senators and Representatives followed suit in numerous media interviews.

Boehner’s short-term plan is “a non-starter in the Senate and with the President,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Sunday.

A short-term bill won’t make it to the President’s desk, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Sunday. House Minority Leader “Nancy Pelosi has said she will not vote for that approach, and it will not make it’s way through the Senate, so that’s not a viable option,” he said on CNN’s State of The Nation show.

White House officials want enough money to get to 2013 because that would prevent a pre-election debt ceiling debate.

Obama is positioning himself to run in 2012 as a fiscal moderate, a D.C. consensus builder, and the public’s defender in a corrupt Washington D.C. He also needs to unite his diverse coalition. But those goals would be hindered by another debt ceiling debate in which he would be asking for even more debt, entangling himself in controversial budget politics, and arguing with his base over what possible budget cuts might be conceded to the GOP.

Reid’s plan, as sketched late on Sunday, would allow 10-year cuts of $2.7 trillion in exchange for $2.4 trillion in extra budgeting authority. That’s enough extra credit to fund current spending until after next year’s election.

Details of the Reid’s $2.4 trillion proposal were not released. But Hill staffers report the deal would include no tax increases, and up to $2.7 trillion in budget cuts.

But those budget cuts may actually be cuts in what Obama has called “spending in the tax code.” If so, the proposal would raise tax revenue by cutting tax breaks for industry and taxpayers.

Reid’s proposed cuts may include large savings from spending that would have occurred if the U.S. still had a large force fighting in Iraq. In effect, those savings would come from cuts to nonexistent programs.

Reid’s spending package may also cut the Pentagon’s budget by more that the $400 billion over 10 years, as Obama has urged.

Senate Democrats are unlikely to endorse significant reforms to entitlement programs, and may prefer to slice Medicare funding allocated to pay the health sector.

Reid’s proposed cuts may also be backloaded into the final few years of the 10-year plan, making them less likely to be implemented.

  • Pingback: A Deal We Can Live With on Debt | Polimerican

  • wake up america

    Reid came out and said ” the republicans are trying to embarrass the president”. Well I would say that the president is doing a good job of embarrassing himself. He’s coming out again tonight and I predict that he will paint the republicans as the party that wants to bring this nation down. What a joke this guy has turned out to be. Does he think that all of us are stupid? Well 52 precent are but that’s not all of us.

    • libertylady

      Yes, and conservatives should find many ways to set the stage for him to embarrass himself, and amply demonstrate his childish, petty, narcissistic, totalitarian self between now and the election.

      Prod, poke, bait, confront, ad nauseum. He is SUCH an easy target. Use the Alinsky tactics against him, beat him at his own game.

  • AlmostaCowboy

    It’s no surprise Obamugabe wants the cuts to extend past the elections. It is, after all, all about HIM.

  • baal

    F*ck Obama–he owns this mess–let him run against his own record.

  • The Center

    afraid of letting voters have a say in this country’s priority is not democratic.

    Let the 2012 elections be about saving ss/medicare and extending the bush tax cuts. it’s really that simple.

    Reid’s plan is a combo of what Cantor agreed to and 1 trill from Ryan’s plan with no tax increases…what’s the problem?

    • pansycritter

      I suppose your understanding is as simplistic as your description of the plan. Is this the Democrat’s talking point one-liners? You been to dailykost to get your newest talking points yet?

  • roger

    do NOT let this extend past the next election