The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
 Sen. Patty Murray motions to a reporter to ask a question during a news conference following a visit to the headquarters of Amazon.com Wednesday, Aug. 10, 2011, in Seattle. On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid named Murray, as well as Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Max Baucus, D-Mont., to a powerful new committee tasked to find a bipartisan plan to slash the federal budget deficit. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)  

Liberal group: Joint committee members should give up leadership, fundraising posts

Common Cause, a liberal nonprofit organization that acts as a “watchdog against corruption and abuse of power,” today called on lawmakers appointed to a debt-reduction joint committee to relinquish their fundraising and leadership roles in Congress.

The group cites concern that the committee, established by recent debt-ceiling legislation, may not act in the best interest of the country if outside pressures and responsibilities interfere with its members’ ability to make tough decisions about federal spending.

“With the public already disgusted with Washington in the wake of the debt limit debacle, it’s vital that people have confidence that Super Committee Members are thinking about the nation’s best interests, not positioning their party or worrying about how their decisions appear to donors,” said Common Cause President Bob Edgar in a statement.

Critics have already raised questions about the appointment of Democratic Senator Patty Murray of Washington, who is also chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Republican Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas is also chair of the House Republican Conference, and Sen. Jon Kyle of Arizona is Minority Whip in the Senate.

Edgar addedd that Republican Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania should make it clear he will act independent of the Tea Party.

Coming up with $1.2 trillion in budget cuts, said Edgar, will require a committee of members “who will shed their partisan labels.” (RELATED: Boehner appoints three House leaders to deficit-reduction committee)

“We also need the committee to fully reflect our nation’s diversity,” he added. “We hope that the three appointments to be made by House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi will strengthen the voices of women and minorities in the Super Committee’s work.”

When asked about the issue in the press briefing Wednesday, White House press secretary Jay Carney said, “Every member of Congress who is elected and sent to Washington to represent his or her constituents has a responsibility to act seriously when asked to deal with such a serious issue, and the President expects the appointed members of this selected committee will do so.”

When pressed specifically about Murray, Carney called it “silly criticism,” and “small-order political issues,” adding that he did not expect her to give up her Democratic fundraising role.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dougbushbc Doug Bush
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Congressional-Dysfunction/100002734806753 Congressional Dysfunction

    “Edgar added
    that Republican Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania should make it clear he will act
    independent of the Tea Party.”

    How does that statement make any sense?

    The idea behind
    representative government is that the elected officials are supposed to represent
    the will of the people that elected them to office.  A large number of Americans want reduced
    spending; in Pennsylvania, a majority of voters elected Toomey based at least
    in part upon his support for reduced spending.  

    Perhaps Edgar could
    explain why Toomey should ignore the wishes of his constituents?  If not to the people who elected him, to whom
    is Toomey accountable?  Common Cause
    claims to support representative government, but this statement certainly
    raises questions about the real focus.

    There is no little blue pill to treat
    Congressional Dysfunction, only the ballot box. http://www.congressionaldysfunction.us

  • Anonymous

    Interesting point, but these are some of the rankings that forced them to be considered in the first place. Changing the rules after they have accepted the positions is just not going to fly.

  • junkmaninohio

    Let me get this straight. We now have  SUPER COMMITTEE to make decisions on spending cuts and tax increases. If this is the way Congress wants to operate, why then, do we need a Congress? Why continue to pay these parasites to sit on the sidelines while a small committee decides all?

    • Anonymous

      Good post, junkman! As long as we will use it, we’ve got a lever for prying these parasites off of our backs;  our votes.

  • aposematic

    Congress plays yet another bad “joke” on the American people in the form of yet another committee. Can there be any wonder as to why America is banging on the gates of Hell.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OJ3NJSXLSJCUY64Q4CTOZLCMUI John

    Do all these liberal women use the same lawn mower for their hair???

    • Craigster

      The old reel type push type — environmentally friendly version that PETA still uses at its dog pounds.

  • spike1120

    It’s a great idea that will never happen.
    patty doonesbury will never give her money raising.
    This committee will not produce one single worthwhile idea. And if it does socialist chairman bo won’t act on the best ideas. That isn’t his idea for America.