Politics
NEW YORK, NY - JUNE 15:  Union members hold a "March for the Middle Class" while blocking a section of Broadway in Manhattan on June 15, 2011 in New York City. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images) NEW YORK, NY - JUNE 15: Union members hold a "March for the Middle Class" while blocking a section of Broadway in Manhattan on June 15, 2011 in New York City. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)  

Three NLRB decisions ‘will kill jobs and force business closures,’ critics say

Photo of Matthew Boyle
Matthew Boyle
Investigative Reporter

On Tuesday the National Labor Relations Board announced three new decisions that industry experts say will likely hurt the economy and cost American jobs.

The first and likely most controversial NLRB ruling overturned a 2007 decision that gave workers nationwide the right to protect themselves from union bosses’ bullying and coercive tactics with secret ballot elections.

Via its newly-decided Lamons Gasket case, the NLRB eliminated the 2007 Dana Corp ruling, which the National Right to Work Foundation said protected workers from “coercive practices” union organizers often used to “bully or mislead employees.”

The Dana Corp. decision allowed workers the opportunity to request a secret ballot election within a 45-day window following a “card-check” organizing effort. Card-check organizing efforts are when union bosses try to get workers they’re targeting to sign cards indicating they want to have a union election.

What union bosses often neglect to tell workers is that if enough workers sign cards, there’s no need for an election. They’d already be unionized.

“The Obama Labor Board’s ruling to kill the Dana Corp. precedent that allows workers a secret ballot vote to kick out a union that gained control of the workplace in an abusive ‘card check’ campaign adds to an already exhaustive list of paybacks from the Obama Administration to Big Labor,” NRTW Foundation president Mark Mix said in a statement. “Big Labor and its allies have launched a full-scale assault on worker freedom and the Obama Administration is working tirelessly to appease them through bureaucratic means after they failed in Congress.”

Mix said that the NLRB decision is an affront to what the American people want and that the decision takes rights away from workers. (RELATED: Outgoing Democratic NLRB chairwoman: Conservatives attacking Board with ‘baseball bat,’ vitriolic rhetoric)

“NLRB’s most recent actions go against what the America people want. The American people and their elected representatives in Congress oppose the Card Check Forced Unionism bill, but the Obama Labor Board seems determined to impose card check on American workers in every way it can,” Mix said. “Taken with the NLRB’s other recent actions, the Obama Administration has made it easier for union operatives to steamroll over workers while making it next to impossible for independent-minded workers to stand up for their rights or decertify the union hierarchy.”

On Tuesday the NLRB also decided that unionized workers should be forced to wait a “reasonable amount of time” before booting a union after a change of ownership at their shop. The UGL-UNNICO Service Company ruling means employees will have to wait an extended period of time before removing an unwanted union if their company’s ownership changes.

The third ruling also favored unions. It allows for “micro union” organizing at non-acute healthcare facilities.

  • Pingback: A Traditional Life Lived: The Patriot Enclave-show notes: 9-1

  • Anonymous

    It seems a gazillion times now, “If it emanates from the left it is Bad for American, and that makes them happy” We all know generalities are lazy, inaccurate— but in this case I grant an exception. I cannot name a single union or even left wing policy that I have said “Boy, that’s a good idea.”