Opinion

TheDC’s Jamie Weinstein: Reluctant warrior Hagel could make war more likely

Photo of Jamie Weinstein
Jamie Weinstein
Senior Editor
  • See All Articles
  • Send Email
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Bio

      Jamie Weinstein

      Jamie Weinstein is Senior Editor of The Daily Caller. His work has appeared in The Weekly Standard, the New York Daily News and The Washington Examiner, among many other publications. He also worked as the Collegiate Network Journalism Fellow at Roll Call Newspaper and is the winner of the 2011 "Funniest Celebrity in Washington" contest. A regular on Fox News and other cable news outlets, Weinstein received a master’s degree in the history of international relations from the London School of Economics in 2009 and a bachelor's degree in history and government from Cornell University in 2006. He is the author of the political satire, "The Lizard King: The Shocking Inside Account of Obama's True Intergalactic Ambitions by an Anonymous White House Staffer."

President Barack Obama’s decision to nominate former Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel for defense secretary is a poor choice for many reasons, but primarily because of the signals his selection sends domestically and internationally — signals which could actually make war more likely for America, not less.

Take Iran, for instance.

Hagel voted against labeling the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization in the Senate, refused to sign a letter urging the European Union to label Hezbollah a terrorist group and has said a military strike against Iran is not a viable option to stop it from obtaining nuclear weapons.

“I would say that a military strike against Iran, a military option, is not a viable, feasible, responsible option,” he said in 2006.

Since President Obama says military options are on the table, Hagel supporters say that it is the president’s position we should care about, not Hagel’s.

Put aside for a moment whether that’s entirely true  — are critics really saying the Pentagon chief is completely irrelevant to such a discussion? — the mere nomination of Hagel sends a significant message to the world. Iran is watching what is going on in Washington. They know Hagel’s positions. And they are reportedly looking on his nomination with glee.

Does not Hagel’s nomination signal to Iranian leadership that President Obama is not particularly serious about using military force to stop Iran’s nuclear program if necessary? And if that’s the signal they’re getting, won’t that give them added incentive to continue their nuclear program without fear the U.S. will mount any military strike against it?

At least one Obama adviser fears that consequence.

“So far, Obama’s big problem is that the threat to use force has not seemed credible,” the unnamed White House adviser told the New York Times. “The question is whether if Chuck is defense secretary, the Iranians would take seriously the thought that he is willing to use force if it comes to that.”

If Iran takes Hagel’s nomination as a signal Washington isn’t serious about stopping its nuclear breakout, then the nomination actually makes military conflict with the Islamic Republic more likely — assuming, of course, the Iranians are wrong and President Obama is serious when he says all options are on the table in stopping Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons capability.

Domestically, Hagel’s nomination signals that President Obama is intent on gutting the Defense Department.

Think about it. President Obama knows he is going to have to deal with the GOP on spending cuts. Even though he says he still wants to tax the rich, that card is essentially played out after the fiscal cliff deal. The president has shown little sign he seriously wants to address the greatest driver of our long-term fiscal problem, Medicare. So what card does he have left to shield Medicare in debt negotiations? Defense.

That’s why Hagel is so attractive to the president: he is a rare Republican who is enthusiastic about making defense cuts.