Opinion
DREAMers (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) and parents take an oath in a mock citizenship ceremony during a "United we Dream," rally on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 10, 2013, sending a signal to the House of Representatives’ GOP leadership as they go into their meeting that afternoon to discuss immigration reform with their caucus. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

No ‘Hispanic Heritage Month’ without ‘immigration summer’

Photo of Jacob Montilijo Monty
Jacob Montilijo Monty
Attorney
  • See All Articles
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Bio

      Jacob Montilijo Monty

      Jacob Montilijo Monty is a Houston-based attorney specializing in labor and immigration matters and a prominent Latino activist.

House Republicans emerged from their first immigration meeting in seven years this Wednesday to reiterate their refusal to allow the bipartisan Senate reform plan to even come up for a vote. The House GOP’s “piecemeal” approach ensures that no reform at all will happen until Congress returns to Washington in September — right about the time of the Republicans’ annual “Hispanic Heritage Month” PR ritual.

In past years, you could almost hear mariachi music in the background as candidates including Mitt Romney read lines like “the Republican Party is the rightful home of Hispanic Americans.” When Romney delivered that particular line to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Los Angeles last year, it drew stone cold silence.

In 2009, then-Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele went so far as to put out both a video message and a news release that was translated into Spanish. The party’s exuberant brownnosing didn’t extend to hiring a capable translator, though — within hours, the blogosphere erupted with stories counting at least nine major translation errors.

This year, unless House Republicans get serious about immigration reform, they can save themselves the trouble.

The Senate’s immigration measure, approved by a lopsided 68-32 margin, should, by any reasonable standard, satisfy even the most die-hard opponent of immigration reform.

Border security is enhanced (almost to the point of overkill) and the path to legal status is complex and arduous, with fines, tax assessments and background checks. Opponents’ concerns have been amply addressed, and what’s left from opponents is a frustrated nativist wail.

Texas Republican Lamar Smith is typical of the House GOP naysayers. After the Senate’s overwhelming vote in support of the measure, Smith took to his Blackberry with Tweets using the hashtag “#NoAmnesty.

With all due respect, Congressman, those seeking legal status under the bipartisan Senate bill face fines, fees, a background check and a minimum ten-year waiting period before even obtaining a Green Card. Those wanting to complete the process will have to wait at least 13 years. Amnesty? Hardly.

The Senate measure calls for an additional $46.3 billion in border-security measures that include the deployment of everything from Blackhawk helicopters to aerial surveillance drones and other military hardware.