The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
FILE - In this Tuesday, Nov. 1, 2011 file photo, first lady Michelle Obama sings and dances to exercises with staff, parents and children as she visits the Royal Castle Child Development Center, as part of the "Lets Move!" initiative in New Orleans, La. In 18 states, there were at least slight drops in obesity for low-income preschoolers, health officials said Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2013. Childhood obesity has been a focus of the Obama White House, with the first lady leading a campaign called "Let

‘Universal’ preschool proposal copies costly Medicaid expansion

Photo of Lee Schalk
Lee Schalk
State Affairs Manager, National Taxpayers Union

As Syria continues to dominate the news cycle, a costly White House proposal is flying under the radar: Preschool for All, an initiative that would provide “universal” pre-K for moderate-income 4 year-olds with the promise of $75 billion in federal tax dollars over 10 years.

To pay for the program, the President has suggested a 94-cent-per-pack cigarette tax hike – a regressive tax that would generate an unreliable revenue stream. By tacking on an additional 94 cents, smokers would be forced to shell out nearly $2 per pack on top of their state and local rates.

Thanks in part to declining rates of smoking, there simply will not be enough cigarette tax revenue to keep the universal pre-K program up and running. Which is bad news for smokers and taxpayers.

Historical data reveal just how shaky tobacco tax revenues have been. A recent report from the National Taxpayer’s Union’s research affiliate determined that in roughly 7 out of every 10 cases state-level tobacco tax hikes enacted between Fiscal Years 2001 and 2011 fell short of their initial revenue estimates. Not surprisingly, 66 out of 96 state actions that raised tobacco levies during that same period were followed by additional tax hikes within two years.

In addition, Preschool for All’s similarities to the Medicaid expansion, another troubled federal-state venture, are cause for concern.

In both instances, the federal government has offered up attractive funding match rates. While half of states have resisted Medicaid expansion so far, many lawmakers and governors have bought into the idea of “free” taxpayer money, since the federal government is offering to cover 90 percent of the costs in the long term. With Preschool for All, states would chip in 10 percent of the costs in the first two years, 50 percent by year six, and eventually 75 percent in year ten.

But what’s to stop the feds from reneging on their funding commitments? For the Medicaid expansion, the President has already floated the idea of lowering federal match rates, which would leave states with a greater burden than originally anticipated.

It’s not difficult to imagine a similar bait-and-switch with Preschool for All, especially once its major revenue stream — cigarette taxes — falls short of projections.

Also like Medicaid expansion, the administration is keeping mum on the topic of long-term costs for universal pre-K. At the state level, all we’ve heard about so far is the magical first year.

Minnesota, for example, would receive close to $39 million from Uncle Sam in year one and only have to kick in $4 million in state funds. In year ten, their share would be 75 percent, or $32.25 million, if the match rates go as planned. But many unprincipled lawmakers simply can’t resist another hit of federal cash and are willing to ignore these future state costs in order enjoy short-term benefits.