Opinion

If the Senate won’t act on a nomination, the president should find a new one

Jim Huffman Dean Emeritus, Lewis & Clark Law School
Font Size:

The United States Constitution grants the president authority to appoint judges and other federal officers subject to the advice and consent of the senate. In anticipation of the need to fill vacancies in these offices when the senate is not in session, the framers allowed for the president to make appointments during senate recesses. To minimize the incentive for abuse, judges and officers appointed in this way would serve only until the end of the next session.

In light of the distances and travel conditions faced by the framing generation, the need for recess appointments was clear. It could take weeks for the members of the senate to reconvene, not to mention that a smaller and less ambitious federal government required much less of congress’ time, allowing for longer recesses during which at least some vacancies might need filling.

Times have changed, as has the understanding of what constitutes a legitimate recess appointment. Not surprisingly, in this age of whatever-it-takes constitutionalism, there is no logical relation between the changed circumstances and modern presidential interpretation of the recess appointment power. While both recesses and travel times have become shorter, the recess appointment powers claimed by presidents of both parties have expanded. As the need for recess appointments has diminished, the executive’s power to make them has expanded.

Today the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in a case challenging this expansion of executive power. On appeal from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the case involves the legitimacy of appointments to the National Labor Relations Board made by President Obama during a mid-session break in senate proceedings. There is much the court might, and probably will, address relating to what constitutes a recess and whether pro forma sessions are really recesses. But to get the decision right the justices should focus on the bigger picture.

The issue most central to the framer’s debates in Philadelphia was the allocation of power among the branches of the national government and between the national and state governments. Believing that effective government requires a strong executive, while knowing from experience that executive power poses one of the greatest threats to liberty, the framers gave the president exclusive discretion on who would serve as judges and high executive officers while giving the senate the final say on whether those chosen by the president would serve. As a protection against the abuse of executive power, the default proposition was that individuals not approved by the senate would not serve.

So the question before the court is how to understand the recess appointments clause in light of this constitutional allocation of power between the president and the senate. A New York Times editorial in Sunday’s edition underscores, if inadvertently, how the court can get the answer wrong. “The government needs to be able to function,” wrote the Times, “even when Congress can’t – or won’t – do its job.”

There can be no argument that the recess appointments clause was intended to allow the government to function when the senate can’t do its job. But when the senate won’t do its job, meaning it is refusing to act on one or more presidential nominations, it is, in fact, doing its job. The senate’s job, with respect to judicial and executive officer nominations, is to approve them or not. In the case of the NLRB appointments, the senate did its job by declining to act on the nominations. Just as it would have been doing its job if it had approved the nominations.

The Times and the president’s lawyers will, no doubt, assert that the senate’s job is to vote up or down on nominations, but that is not the way the legislative process works. In every session of Congress thousands of bills are introduced and not acted upon. We generally understand this non-action as a rejection of the proposed legislation, and so it should be with executive nominations.

The system established by the framers of the constitution is actually very simple. The president nominates. The senate advises and consents. When the senate can’t advise and consent, the president may make temporary appointments. When the senate won’t advise and consent, the nomination dies. Explaining and enforcing that simple arrangement could be accomplished in one of the court’s shortest opinions ever. But don’t count on it.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel