The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
Latinos protest in favor of comprehensive immigration reform on the West side of Capitol Hill in Washington, April 10, 2013. REUTERS/Larry Downing Latinos protest in favor of comprehensive immigration reform on the West side of Capitol Hill in Washington, April 10, 2013. REUTERS/Larry Downing  

Why Obama shares blame for blocking immigration reform

Photo of Geoff Holtzman
Geoff Holtzman
Deputy Bureau Chief, Talk Radio News Service

As usual, the trendy group-think narrative in Washington is that House Speaker John Boehner is singlehandedly blocking immigration reform by not committing to a vote anytime soon.

It’s easy to see why Democrats are frustrated. They thought that Boehner had finally broken through the conservative obstacle, known as the U.S. House of Representatives, when he released his caucus’ principles for immigration reform last week.

The document, they noted, does not explicitly endorse a pathway to full citizenship for the estimated 11-to-12 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally (the real number is likely much higher). But, they said, it amounts to serious progress from 2012, when the GOP’s idea of immigration reform was “self-deportation.”

As everyone should know by now, President Obama’s position is that the House should simply pass the Senate bill, which features an opportunity for undocumented immigrants to become Americans as long as they meet a series of pre-conditions and wait a decade or so. Boehner’s framework essentially is the Senate bill — more border security, more guest workers, more high-skilled visas, more money for technology to track immigrants who come and go — but with a slightly less rewarding finish line for those who don’t qualify for the DREAM Act.

Therefore, although Obama has yet to flat-out dismiss the proposal, the White House is assuring its base that it doesn’t satisfy the president’s requirements for legislation.

But in reality, it might, and the White House might want to give it another look.

As ardent immigration reform critic Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) points out, the Boehner plan does, indeed, include a special pathway to citizenship. For starters, it would afford citizenship to millions of so-called DREAMers who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children or teenagers. To date, 14 states, including New Jersey, which is run by the guy who has an outside shot at becoming the Republican standard-bearer in 2016, have adopted versions of the DREAM Act.

If nothing else, the House framework could be viewed as an effort to get everyone on the same page before the elections, unlike what happened back in 2012 when Republicans were all over the map on the issue.

Sessions’ other argument is somewhat more abstract, but one that Democrats should pay attention to. It goes something like this. If Congress somehow teamed up this year to pass a bill that allowed immigrants to receive legal permanent residency (LPR), otherwise known as a green card, and Obama signed it into law, then Democrats and all their special interest allies would immediately begin phase two of the battle; a push for full citizenship.

They’d argue that while LPR eliminates the threat many immigrants face of being deported, it simultaneously makes them second-class human beings who exist in a sort of political purgatory whereby they don’t have equal rights as their peers who happened to be born in the U.S.A.

Sure, Republicans would put up a valiant fight. But Sessions believes that the momentum on the Democratic side would eventually be too much to overcome. And unless they win complete control of Congress, Republicans would be unable to stave off the immense lobbying pressure.