Opinion
U.S. Senate candidate Matt Bevin (R-KY) speaks to a gathering at FreePAC Kentucky in Louisville, Kentucky, April 5, 2014. Picture taken April 5, 2014. REUTERS/John Sommers II U.S. Senate candidate Matt Bevin (R-KY) speaks to a gathering at FreePAC Kentucky in Louisville, Kentucky, April 5, 2014. Picture taken April 5, 2014. REUTERS/John Sommers II  

Bevin Never Had A Shot, And He Wouldn’t Have Changed Anything Anyway

Photo of Mike Maharrey
Mike Maharrey
Communications Director, The Tenth Amendment Center
  • See All Articles
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Bio

      Mike Maharrey

      Mike Maharrey serves as the national communications director for the Tenth Amendment Center. He is also the author of Our Last Hope: Rediscovering the Lost Path to Liberty. You may contact Mike at: michael.maharrey@tenthamendmentcenter.com.

The curtain fell on tea party dreams of triumph in the Kentucky Republican primary Tuesday night.

As CNN put it — “Establishment Crushes Tea Party.”

Senator Mitch McConnell rolled over challenger Matt Bevin, amassing 60 percent of the vote.

Bevin reportedly spent over $3 million in his effort to unseat the powerful Senate minority leader. Add to that hundreds of volunteer-hours and you have quite an effort by tea party conservatives and libertarian-leaning Republicans hoping to oust a poster-boy for establishment Republican politics.

What a waste.

Bevin never really had a shot. It wasn’t that his message of limited government and conservative principles fell flat. McConnell basically ran on that same message. It was a matter of money, power and name recognition. There was no way upstart Bevin was going to topple the applecart — not with $3 million, or even $6 million.

And let’s be honest; even if Bevin had managed to pull off the upset, then moved on to defeat Democrat Allison Lundergan-Grimes in November, does anybody really believe he would have fundamentally changed anything in Washington D.C.? Guaranteed – two years after a Bevin victory, the federal government would have been bigger, more invasive and deeper in debt.

America does not have a problem with the people running the system in D.C. The system in D.C. is the problem. And we won’t change it by swapping out a few cogs. Conservatives have attempted this approach since the 1940s and it fails over and over again. As a friend said, this thinking represents “a leap of faith into the abyss of disaster.”

Trying to solve America’s problems by voting the bums out and replacing them with better bums is a lawn care approach to politics.

From around mid-March through October, I spend about 90 minutes every week walking in circles around my yard, ears assailed by a deafening, monotonous drone. When I finish up, the grass looks really nice. Then, about three days later, the lawn begins to take on a bit of a raggedy look. By the next week, I have to repeat the process again.

And again.

And again.

Once I complete my weekly drudgery, I invariably begin pondering ways to make the grass just stop growing. Of course, I can’t. Grass grows. That’s its nature. Only one way exists to avoid the weekly mowing ritual. Fundamentally change the nature of my yard — as in rip out all of the grass by the roots.

American politics looks a lot like my lawn care routine – top down and ineffective.