The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
              German Cardinal Walter Kasper, left, shares a word with Indian Cardinal George Alencherry in St. Peter

The Scandal Of Cardinal Kasper

Cardinal Walter Kasper has become the man of the hour within the Roman Catholic Church. With the English-language release of his new book Mercy, and the clear favor he is enjoying under Pope Francis, the retired German bishop and former curial official is suddenly attaining celebrity status while being heralded as “The Pope’s Theologian.”

However, after a recent string of media appearances in which Kasper made shockingly indiscrete comments about the Holy Father’s own opinions on Catholic marriage, while ignoring the teaching of St. John Paul II, it may be time for the Holy See to ask the Cardinal to restrain his public commentary. Cardinal Kasper should belong in the same category as his former professor, the famous Hans Kung: a respected theologian, but someone whose opinions cannot be taken as indicative of serious, orthodox Catholicism. The Holy Father should corral this Cardinal, whose teachings on divorce and remarriage are the very antithesis to St. John Paul II’s call for Catholics to witness to their belief with heroism and authenticity.  Given his recent comments following his trip to the Holy Land, the Holy Father might be doing just that.

What Kasper Is Proposing

Kasper’s most significant proposal is that Catholics who have gotten divorced, who have civilly remarried, and who wish to come back to the regular reception of the Sacrament of Holy Communion (which Catholics believe to be Jesus Christ himself), should be allowed to do so upon some evidence of their leading a more evidently “Christian” life. The Church teaches that individuals who commit serious sin should not present themselves for communion until they repent, and those in manifestly grave sin should actually be denied Holy Communion until they reform. As a Catholic, being publicly “remarried” in a civil ceremony while your first, Christian spouse is alive qualifies as the manifestly grave sin of public adultery. For the Catholic Church, a marriage lasts for the life of the two partners, no exceptions.

Thus, Kasper’s idea of what constitutes “living a Christian life” for a remarried divorcee is unclear. It does not include a refusal to continue committing what is objectively adultery. The Cardinal has promoted these novel views in a recent American media and lecture blitz: a sold-out talk at Fordham University, a radio interview on “The Brian Lehrer Show” on New York Public Radio, and a long interview with Commonweal magazine.

Essentially, while the Cardinal deeply admires the “heroic” action of remarried Catholic divorcees who cease having sexual relationships with their second “spouse” in order to return to the Church’s Sacraments, the Cardinal believes that the Church cannot require this kind of “heroism” from everyone in similar circumstances. In his Commonweal interview, Kasper said, “To live together as brother and sister? Of course I have high respect for those who are doing this. But it’s a heroic act, and heroism is not for the average Christian.” He believes a “way out” must be offered to people that allows them to receive communion while continuing to live in their objectively adulterous second marriages, and that this is an expression of mercy.

What a contrast to the teachings of the recently-canonized Saint John Paul II, who constantly encouraged Christians to strive for personal holiness without fear. Kasper is also in blatant opposition to the traditional teaching of the Church as expressed in Familiaris Consortio, John Paul II’s 1981 document regarding the Christian family, in which he expressly insisted that divorced and remarried Catholics are called to the very kind of heroic virtue that Kasper pooh-poos.

Why Kasper Should Be Silenced

Kasper’s views are not scholarly proposals offered to the Holy Father and to the bishops for their private review. He is clearly engaged in a kind of political campaign to change the millennia-long practice and teaching of the Church in a way that would radically alter and, I argue, weaken the Church’s public stance for Christian marriage and sexual morality.

This weakening can immediately be seen in Kasper’s interview, when (around the 23:00 mark) Brian Lehrer asks Cardinal Kasper why, if the Church could accept divorce and remarriage, she could not also accept homosexuality, contraception, or other changes to her teaching. If we can tolerate one fundamental change — like tolerating divorce and remarriage — then why not others? Kasper is clearly a bit flustered, and winds up saying that the Church is not even opposed to birth control, something which would be news to John Paul II.