Opinion
Germany Germany's Mario Goetze shoots to score a goal against Argentina during extra time in their 2014 World Cup final at the Maracana stadium in Rio de Janeiro July 13, 2014. REUTERS/Dylan Martinez   

What The ‘Pope Cup’ Says About Pope Francis’s Revolutionary Leadership

Photo of John Paul Shimek
John Paul Shimek
Vatican Journalist
  • See All Articles
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Bio

      John Paul Shimek

      John Paul Shimek is a veteran Vatican journalist. He was accredited to the Holy See Press Office in March 2013. And, he holds advanced graduate degrees in Roman Catholic Theology and Political, Legal, and Moral Philosophy from the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. His degrees were presented to him in the names of Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, and Cardinal Donald Wuerl.

      He has served as a special assistant to the now-Cardinal Timothy Michael Dolan and Archbishop Jerome Listecki of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. And, he has provided advisory counsel to numerous Church and civic leaders, including Victoria Thorn of the Pontifical Academy for Life at the Vatican and the National Office of Post-Abortion Reconciliation and Healing.

      John Paul makes regular appearances in the national and international news media where he has been interviewed on a variety of television, radio, and podcast programs and has published expert analysis and commentary both on-line and in print. He has written and spoken on a wide spectrum of theological and public forum topics for such media outlets as the Catholic News Agency, Catholic World Report, the National Catholic Register, Crisis Magazine, and CatholicVote.org, among others.

      Readers can visit him at www.pilgrimjournalist.com, like him and friend him on Facebook, follow him on Twitter (@pilgrimjournal), and join his circle on Google+. He welcomes e-mails at jpshimek@pilgrimjournalist.com.

The Germans and the Argentinians battled out the final match of the 2014 FIFA World Cup on Sunday, July 13. While the global games will not resume until the Russians host them in the summer of 2018, sports enthusiasts will be buzzing about this tournament for some time to come.

Between June 12 and July 13, the Brazilians made headlines and set new records in the international game of soccer. Some new technologies were introduced in Rio, when a paraplegic in a full robotic suit kicked off the month-long competition. And new goal-line technologies connected fourteen stadium cameras (seven focused on each goal post) and a mainframe computer with referees’ wristwatches, which transmitted vibrations and messages each time a goal was scored.

The games had other firsts too: For the first time since 1978, South America hosted the World Cup, which meant that three national teams had to travel more than 8,600 miles to get there.

But most notably, even though the Italian team went home in June, as the Germans and the Argentinians prepared to compete against one another in the games’ closing match, the international news media did not take its focus off of two residents of Rome

As USA Today reported at the outset of the championship’s closing weekend, “For the first time ever, the two teams facing each other in the World Cup final will each have a living pope in their corner.” There haven’t been two living popes since 1296 — some six centuries before the formation of FIFA in 1904.

While the start of global soccer’s most watched game approached, Facebook and Twitter lit up with posts, tweets, and memes, announcing the kick-off of “#PopeCup.” Light-hearted repartee set the two pontiffs against one another in imitation of their national teams’ rivalry. Perhaps the ribbing was not far of the mark. The Argentine Pope Francis is a faithful fan of the San Lorenzo Soccer Club and the German Pope Emeritus, Benedict XVI, follows important sporting matches with interest, according to Fr. Federico Lombardi, the Director of the Holy See’s Press Office.

As a matter of fact, heading into this summer, Pope Francis expressed great interest in the competition, but he promised to take up a neutral posture. Instead of interceding before God on behalf of his favorite soccer team, he decided to take advantage of the explosion of media attention on the sport in order to proclaim the harmonizing effects of the Christian Gospel.

In mid-June, he sent a video message to the organizers, athletes, and fans of the World Cup. In it, he stated that “Sport is not only a form of entertainment, but also — and I would say above all — a tool to communicate values which promote the good of the human person and contribute to building a more peaceful and fraternal society.” Later, he followed that message with Twitter tweets, audience addresses, and Sunday Angelus messages extolling the Christian virtues that make for fair, but competitive sport.

The pope’s pro-religion humanitarian messaging didn’t stop there. Rather, he sought to involve his flock in the initiative. Each month, the Bishop of Rome announces a new set of specific prayer intentions. In urban cathedrals and rural chapels around the world, those intentions are remembered each time Catholics celebrate Mass. This month, Pope Francis and his one billion followers have been praying that “sports may always be occasions of human fraternity and growth,” according to the Vatican Information Service. In effect, Pope Francis underwrote the World Cup with the full faith and credit of the Catholic Church. And, that got some people talking.

Secularist and atheistic commentators spent the period of the competition contrasting perceived “religious” violence — like that engulfing Iraq — with the neutral, non-sectarian humanitarianism of the World Cup. Their contrast echoed an emerging undertone in the politics of international athletics: Global athletic championships, bleached of religion, are a means to reset the course of international politics, which the force of world religions has destabilized (if not derailed). The insinuation was that religion ravages, but events devoid of transcendent references restore. Similar accusations have become so much a creedal proposition of post-modern critiques of religion that Pope Benedict XVI felt compelled to address it in his inaugural encyclical letter Deus Caritas Est (God Is Love).

But, Pope Francis decided to seize the 2014 global games as an opportune occasion to challenge that ideological rhetoric head-on. In advance of the final match, he sent out a subtle critique of it. Pointing out the close connection between faith and athletics, he tweeted that the “World Cup allowed people from different countries and religions to come together.” Some 4.23 million Twitter users follow the pope’s account. As the Huffington Post claims, he “has by far the most clout of any world leader on Twitter.”

In the meta- (or, supra-)athletic discussions surrounding this summer’s global competition, two sides of a debate emerged, then: Either religion divides – and so it should be kept far from events like the World Cup; or it unites — and so the efforts and appeals of religious leaders, like the pope, bear that out. But, which side has it right? Truth be told, the accusations of the secularists don’t hold up in the face of facts.

Recently, the website of the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry (CARM) republished critical data from the three-volume 2004 Encyclopedia of Wars – a publication of Facts on File that chronicles more than one thousand of the world’s wars. According to CARM researcher Dr. Robin Schumacher, the encyclopedia’s editors, Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod, show that “The historical evidence is quite clear: Religion is not the #1 cause of war.”