Opinion

On The Corruption Of Science Applied Beyond Its Limitation

Alan Keyes Former Assistant Secretary of State
Font Size:

Last weekend I attended a conference on issues of life and death in the medical sciences. These days such issues exemplify the extent to which the presumption of knowledge, supposedly verified by empirical methods, is being exploited to the detriment of respect for human life, in individuals and on the whole.

Dr. Paul Byrne shared vital information about the threat from such presumptions at the end of life, when it comes to determining so-called “brain death,” so that human organs can be harvested from people who must still be alive for that purpose, or else the organs will not be suitable for transplant.

Mercedes Wilson addressed the issue at the start of life. Encouraged especially by Planned Parenthood’s ideology of death, prevalent methods of family planning involve aborting nascent human offspring, even though a more reliable method, informed by God’s careful respect for human life, dispenses with the need for child murder.

Walter Hoye spoke about notorious historical episodes of so-called medical research that exploited the ignorance and vulnerability of black Americans. Under the guise of treatment, people were infected with deadly diseases, then placed in “control groups,” to be left untreated until death, their lives extinguished in order to generate research data.

Robert Schindler spoke about the judicial murder of his sister, callously deprived of conscientious care he and her other family members were anxious to provide, all to respect the perverse whim of a husband, his marriage vows forsworn, who was perversely determined to prevent others from doing what he no longer cared to do.

Once upon a time, “Abstain from harm (injury, injustice)” was the preeminent rule of the medical profession. I’m sure that many doctors of old who joined the profession did so on account of their positive commitment to the welfare of their patients. But the knowledge to help people was acquired along with extensive knowledge that could be used to injure them. Therefore, the sworn rule of their profession also served to reassure people that no bribe or blandishment would induce its learned members to abuse their knowledge in any way that harmed their patients.

In a world where an abortionist is accepted as a bone fide member of the medical profession; where a so-called medical doctor can assist in suicide; where medical prescriptions are ad-driven matters for supply and demand in the general marketplace; where profit opportunities or political ambitions almost exclusively drive funding for medical research; why would anyone in their right mind simply trust medical professionals?

The word “professional” once applied to people whose love of goodness, truth and the ideal of their profession led them to swear a sacred oath that no promise or threat would induce them to betray. These days it is often taken to mean almost the opposite, referring to people who work for some extraneous or material reward, as opposed to amateurs, who aim to serve and realize a beloved ideal.

When it comes to medical, or any other field of science, it should be obvious that this change implies corruption. True science isn’t just a matter of scrupulous method and accurate observation. It involves applying the results they produce in the service of truth, accurately distinguishing what has been empirically verified from what has not; and refusing to make claims that ignore that distinction. The problem with defining a science-based profession in terms of its rewards is that verified facts will be hidden or ignored in order to maximize profit.

Thanks to its success over the past century and more, the credibility of the empirical scientific method has vastly increased. It has therefore acquired dogmatic authority, totally at odds with its logic. For that logic makes no claim of definitive knowledge beyond what has been verified by empirically disciplined observation. Dogmatism is therefore entirely alien to its character.

But the overall corruption of the professional ethic means that most scientific professionals are now bound to be mastered by considerations extraneous to what would have been the ideal of their profession. Pressured by those considerations, they give themselves over to a reprobate mind, abusing the reputation of science to impose dogmatic opinions that either have not been, or could logically never be verified by the empirical method. This is particularly true when it comes to matters involving relations among human subjects, where questions of good and evil, right and wrong, justice and injustice, inevitably arise.

Scientists can tell us more and more about what killed the person whose body they are examining. But they cannot scientifically determine whether the person died justly or unjustly. They can help Hitler or some other instigator of mass slaughter devise efficient means to take the lives of millions. But they cannot scientifically determine whether the slaughter purifies or degrades the human race. Even if they scrupulously observe their empirical method, they cannot tell us whether waiting to observe the consequences of mass slaughter, before approving or condemning it, is morally justified.

Such human moral judgments require standards for action that cannot wait upon empirical results. We need to know that such egregious slaughter is wrong before it is done, by means of a standard we can discern and apply before the data is in. Was this the reason ancient doctors were bound by a general rule to do no harm, without regard to extraneous considerations, however subjectively expedient? Was it that moral judgments have no basis in fact, as some have openly argued in the modern era?

Or was it because the empirical basis of certain sciences cannot adequately address the truth of conclusions radically dependent on the factual activity of human subjects. Their actions and reactions depend on determinations that elude immediate observation, even though they are immediately known by the subjects responsible for them? As Macbeth says of his schemes, “strange things” they have “in head that will to hand, which must be acted ere they may be scanned.”

“Between the idea and the reality, between the motion and the act, falls the shadow,” as T.S. Eliot put it. From evolution to “brain death,” from the “Big Bang” theory to apocalyptic speculations about population growth or climate change, there are supposedly “scientific” prognostications that ring hollow when they dogmatically claim the authority of empirical science for events that, by their very nature, are banished from the stage of human cognitive understanding.

Is this one reason the Biblical understanding of God has such cogency that it remains an obsession even for those who question or deny it? In the Biblical account, Adam searched among the animals for a being like himself, but he found none, until God intervened. Then, by the representation of God, he immediately knew himself in Eve. But how did he recognize what he was seeing for the first time? Somehow he knew the truth without first observing it, understood its meaning as the subject of an experience he could not observe, but that informed him nonetheless.

At its heart, doesn’t every observation that is subject to our understanding have this elusive certainty about it? It is the same certainty with which we know that we ourselves exist, even though, in every observation, we are always standing, as it were, behind the camera’s lens?Thus we are invisible to ourselves, just as God as such is invisible to us. If our way of knowing requires that we deny His presence, what are we to make of it? If, on the other hand, we effectively know ourselves to be, how can we claim to deny that being itself is known to us, though only in effect?

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel