Politics

The Supreme Court Abortion Ruling Was Even Worse Than You Think For Pro-Lifers

REUTERS/Jim Bourg

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Kevin Daley Supreme Court correspondent
Font Size:

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling Monday in Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt wasn’t just a defeat for pro-life groups in Texas, the Court’s decision essentially announced a new test that made abortion regulation much harder across the country.

The Supreme Court vacated a Texas law that placed two restrictions on abortion clinics in the state. The bill required all abortion clinics to host medical capabilities equivalent to an outpatient surgical center, and that any doctor performing an abortion have admitting privileges at a hospital not more than 30 miles away from the abortion facility. In a 5-3 decision written by Justice Stephen Breyer, the Court found the law unconstitutional. (RELATED: SCOTUS Axes Texas Abortion Law)

The law was judged against criterion laid out by the Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey which, while affirming the central holding of Roe v. Wade was still good law, authorized states to levy restrictions on abortion providing they do no manifest an “undue burden” on women seeking access to reproductive health care. Since then, states around the country have established a wide spectrum of abortion regulations, designed to test the exact meaning of “undue burden” in federal courts.

Those efforts may have backfired, as the Court announced a more expansive reading of the undue burden test, which will likely make passing abortion restrictions much more difficult.

The undue burden test is fairly straightforward in that it asks a simple question that can solicit only two responses – is a burden undue or not? However this case raised more questions for the Court to consider.

Pro-choice groups challenging the law argued that the two restrictions placed on abortion clinics did not provide a real benefit to women because abortion is, when performed by professionals in a medically sound environment, by and large a safe procedure. Therefore, their purpose can only be to unduly burden women because the state cannot point to tangible benefits the restrictions accomplish. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, a lower court which upheld the law, ruled that the court is not required to consider the existence (or nonexistence) of medical benefits and that evaluating the utility of said benefits is the proper function of a legislature and not a court. (RELATED: Supreme Court Rejects Three Pro Life Petitions After Abortion Ruling)

The Supreme Court disagreed, finding that the courts are obligated to assess the benefits abortion restrictions confer, and are under no obligation to defer to a legislature on the question of a benefit’s usefulness. “The Court of Appeals’ approach simply does not match the standard that this Court laid out in Casey, which asks courts to consider whether any burden imposed on abortion access is ‘undue,'” the Court said.

“The statement that legislatures, and not courts, must resolve questions of medical uncertainty is also inconsistent with this Court’s case law,” it added.

Furthermore, the test established in Casey required that a state also demonstrate that an abortion regulation is connected to a compelling state interest. The Fifth Circuit found that the Texas restrictions were reasonably related to a compelling state interest. These “magic words” – reasonably related – are called the rational basis test, the default standard of review used when a court judges constitutional questions.

The Supreme Court said the Fifth Circuit also erred in this regard, finding that when a court evaluates an abortion restriction, it must use a more rigorous test. “And the second part of the test is wrong to equate the judicial review applicable to the regulation of a constitutionally protected personal liberty with the less strict review applicable where, for example, economic legislation is at issue,” Breyer wrote.

Taken together, Monday’s reading of the undue burden test from Casey – formerly a straightforward yes or no proposition – now requires states to demonstrate that abortion restrictions yield benefits for women, that the value of said benefits must pass judicial muster, and that abortion restrictions must be measured against a more stringent standard of judicial review.

In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas acknowledged how stringent the new prongs are. “These precepts are nowhere to be found in Casey or its successors, and transform the undue-burden test to something much more akin to strict scrutiny,” he wrote.

That’s hardly the result pro-life groups were hoping for. The ruling’s implications beyond Texas were immediately evident. The Court denied review on Tuesday in two abortion cases from Mississippi and Wisconsin which, like the Texas law, required doctors preforming abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. Other state restrictions on abortion may soon be in jeopardy.

Follow Kevin on Twitter

Send tips to kevin@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel