Thanks to John Lott for bringing the facts to the gun control argument
If Hillary appoints Scalia’s replacement and gets her wish to overturn Heller and McDonald, governments could again ban all guns
If Obama really had confidence in his case, he wouldn’t have to make up so many false claims.
France’s strict background checks and weapons bans didn’t stop the terrorists from getting the AK-47s and explosive belts.
Clinton also wants to end right-to-carry laws that let 13 million Americans carry concealed handguns for protection.
The Violence Policy Center has more than triple-counted the true number of murders by permit-holders
Gun buybacks and bans haven’t worked out the way Clinton thinks
Ahmed Mohamed isn’t a young scientific genius who deserves to be lionized.
The mother apparently purchased the handgun because of several previous attempted break-ins of her home.
McAuliffe apparently encouraged Parker’s father to speak out on the issue.
Yes, deterrence works, and simply allowing citizens to carry guns works too.
If the political left can’t win the arguments on facts, they go after the person.
Unless the databases are dramatically improved, expanded background checks are likely to do more harm than good.
Attempts to ban guns from certain areas simply make sure that it is the law-abiding victims who are unarmed.
More guns actually does mean less crime
Since 1950, virtually all the mass public shootings in the U.S. have taken place in gun free zones.
It’s the first in that range’s 14 years of operation.
Racial quotas lead to worse policing.
The question is whether we want to protect black victims or black criminals.
They don’t reduce accidental deaths, and leave people more vulnerable to criminals.