Opinion

Humanitarianism is fueled by free and open communication

Elliot Engstrom Lead Counsel, Civitas Institute
Font Size:

Self-interest and humanitarianism

Human beings are either entirely or nearly entirely driven by self-interest, this much has been made clear by studies in both philosophy and economics.  Sadly, I do not here have time to provide a proof of this claim, but I can throw out a few of the great thinkers who have come to this conclusion:

Ludwig von Mises said that all people are rational maximizers operating via a subjective theory of value

Karl Marx believed that all people were engaged in a battle over resources.

Nietzsche said that the natural human being attempts to exert his will and force upon the world surrounding him.

Plato said that all men desire good things, but each man has his own subjective opinion of the “good” which he came to via his own experiences (both during and before “life”.

I highly doubt that human nature has changed a great deal in 100 years.

However, 100 years ago it was very common for European nations to do just about whatever they wanted to the rest of the world.  In fact, human nature is in all likelihood not very different now than it was in the days of the early church, when Christians were wrapped in lambskin, covered in oil, and burned alive in order to serve as torches.

Humanitarianism goes mainstream

Today we see humanitarianism preached in the mainstream media.  While it must be noted that preaching humanitarianism and practicing it are two different things entirely, the effort to appear humanitarian is unique in itself in relation to the rest of human history.  The one exception is cases in which the ruling class found it necessary in some sense to make concessions or to appease the slave class; and this exception is telling.

Human beings are self-motivated creatures and they are also generally social creatures.  These two instincts combined create a human being that exists within a spectrum of either trying to control other human beings or trying to have a positive relationship with these other human beings.

Very few humans openly try to bring harm upon themselves from other humans without having a deeper purpose in mind.  If we add to this the fact that we live in a world of instant mass communication that is available not just to the ruling class, but to the ‘slave class’ as well, we begin to understand why a great deal of humanitarian rhetoric is now seen in the mainstream.

If we do something in violation of the desires of another human being, a million people can instantly know it, and fear that we will do the same thing to them.  We thus cannot go about doing whatever we want to anyone we want, even if we have the power to do it in the moment; because it will immediately bring up the greater force of humanity against us, albeit in reference again to our own self-interest.

Interestingly enough, this development is more akin to a return to a past system than an entirely new development in and of itself.  For the majority of human history, humans existed in a much more small-scale society than they do today.  Therefore, the actions of each individual were apparent to every member of the group.  Everyone acting in their own self-interest involved everyone retaining the approval of the rest of the group.  If one person got out of line or did not do his or her share of the work, it was obvious to everyone that he or she was a negative influence, and this would affect how much food and protection he or she received.

Civilization took away the natural mechanism of keeping human beings in check; the ability to witness the actions of the other members of the group.    In the tribal community, if one robbed from another, it was rather hard to cover one’s tracks, and one almost definitely ended up paying the consequences.  In modern society, if one steals from another, cuts in front of another in traffic, or commits violence against another, the only way, until recently, that one could be found and punished one’s actions was if the offender was someone both known and then found by the offended.

Mass media and mass communication are pushing modern society back towards the tribal dynamics of accountability.  Thus, it is not human nature that is changing to a more positive form, but rather society than is changing to better keep human nature in check.

Considering that we are only in the evolving stages of this increase in mass communication, which has not yet reached the entire world, it makes sense that the mainstream would have us be extremely concerned with the plight of the African continent, but care nothing for the problems in countries such as, for example, Indonesia.

Mass empathy?

There also is here an element of what can be called empathy or sympathy.  Humans relate to what they know, and mass communication increases the sources of knowledge for a single human being.  If I see a young boy starving to death in the Sudan on a live TV feed, suddenly I am sad.  However, before I saw the TV feed he was still starving, and yet I did not care about him.

While I may not have ever starved before, I do know what hunger is like, and I know that starving would be a horrible experience.  The starving boy is now a part of my life.  I think about him, whether I want to or not.  Granted, different humans think about the starving boy to different extents — why this is we cannot say; perhaps it is predisposition, perhaps some people are really just nicer than others.  However, mass communication helps us to feel as though these people in other countries are part of “our tribe,” rather than simply hostile, unknown members of a foreign tribe.

What does this mean?

First off, any attempt to monitor the mass communication that has been the mechanism of this change back towards the tribal mechanism should be viewed with complete and utter hostility.

Those in government are no different than the rest of us in that they have the same human, self-serving nature, even if they have convinced themselves that they have the better interests of their fellow man at heart.

If one is able via coercion to put themselves above being easily recognized for their infringements on their fellow men, it would give this person or group immense power, and would in all likelihood be an incentive for them to do whatever they want, with the expectation that they will not be found out.

This description also tells us to be skeptical of those who claim to be humanitarian.  Note that this does not mean we should attempt to hinder humanitarian efforts.  Quite the contrary, it would seem that, considering mass communication as a return to the tribal mechanism, humanitarianism is a much more natural state of humanity than colonization and mass wars of the past.

However, what we must never fail to understand is that anyone can claim humanitarianism as their cause, and while we can still admit that even the most genuine forms of humanitarianism can, in the end, be self-serving, there is a difference between those forms that actually produce tangible goods for those who are helped, and those which merely serve to build up a false reputation and, in innumerable cases, increase the level of dependency by the poorest of society in order to increase the power of the higher echelons.

It would seem that one of the best methods we have available to us of limiting wars and violence is in fact keeping as open as possible the methods of modern communication.  In this way, the tribal mechanism of accountability can once again take its place, and help to push human beings towards less exertions of force over others, and more compromises that benefit both parties involved as much as possible.

It seems to me that if humanitarianism and the free market continue to be successful and continue to reinforce and increase the use of mass media as more and more cultures are brought out of poverty, then more and more human beings will be unleashed from the animalistic state of merely attempting to eat, survive, and protect one’s young.  If more and more human beings can take such things for granted, then they will have more time for things such as music, art, and philosophy, things that such great thinkers as Nietzsche called the true metaphysical activities of the human race, and it would seem that this would be a massive step of progress for the human species as a whole.

Elliot Engstrom is a 2010 graduate of Wake Forest University, where he majored in French with a double minor in history and journalism, and a member of the University of Georgia School of Law Class of 2013.  Aside from his schoolwork and contributions to the Daily Caller, he writes for Young Americans for Liberty, Learning From Dogs, and Rethinking the State.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel