The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Justifiable public ‘investment’: Maher rips GOP for being anti-gang facial tattoo removal

While it’s no secret where HBO “Real Time” host ’s political loyalties lie, his idea of government’s role in society is a bit odd, at least when it comes to how public money should be spent.

In a appearance on Tuesday’s “The Show” on MSNBC, Maher criticized Republicans and Wisconsin Rep. ’s budget proposal for being anti-tax and scaling back the role of government.

“Well, that’s their dream world of no taxes, because, as you know, the lower taxes are somehow magically the more revenue we have,” Maher said. “Isn’t that really what Paul Ryan’s plan is still based on, that fantasy that was discredited in the ’80s? But I think, even more, it shows that they are always trying to somehow screw — screw the present for the future. You know, cutting for premature babies, for example, is going to cost us so much more down the road in health-care costs. Everything in their budget seems very short-sighted this way.”

Maher’s best example for promoting a more active government role in society? Taxpayer-funded, gang-member facial tattoo removal. He called it an investment rather than just spending, and suggested it would eventually pay for itself.

“I’ll give you an example,” Maher said. “There was a program to get rid of — to pay to get rid of the tattoos that gang members sometimes have on their face— you know this, Rachel. You were in a gang. You had you a tattoo, OK? You couldn’t have that job — you couldn’t have this job if you had a tattoo on your face. It’s very hard to get a job with a tattoo on your face. So, of course, you can hear the right wingers say why should we pay to help a bunch of gang bangers? Because if you do, they can become productive members of society. See? This is the difference between just spending and investment. They think all of spending — all of investment, you know, you say investment, I hear spending. Well, sometimes, it is investment, and sometimes, you have to invest for the future. You know, if you buy a nice suit to get a job and you get a job, that suit pays for itself.”

According to the 2009 Citizens Against Government Waste “Pig Book,” Democratic Reps. and , both of California, have had $200,000 and $50,000 respectively appropriated for tattoo removal procedures.

Watch:

YouTube Preview Image

  • Pingback: Enlightenment Under Threat (incl. Bill Maher & Pat Condell) | Bill Maher

  • KGC

    This is so indicative of what an insulated simpleton this baffoon is. He really thinks that if WE pay to subsidize removal of gang facial tattoos that they’ll become “productive members of society.” Riiiight… Because they were such productive members before they got the tattoos. Because, after all, it’s the tattoos that turned them. I say we underwriter seeing to it that they NEVER get their tattoos removed so as we can always easily identify who the scum among us are. Unfortunately, Maher’s already has his tats taken down, so we’ll just have to make a mental note that he’s one of the scum.

  • xiansahd

    There are a lot of resources already out there to help with tattoo removal. In Southern California you can see places like http://www.tat2begone.com working with organizations to help people in all types of situations. It’s nice to know that you can have a second chance when you really need it.

  • jonavark

    Much cheaper just to shoot em.

  • sunnyr

    The Misogynist IDIOT, Bill Maher, has never heard of personal responsibility. Let that goofy *astard either live with his tattoo’s or have them removed with his own money, or Bill Maher’s money. No more frivilous welfare for this kind of moronic vermin.

  • riseabove

    Gee, good thing they blocked that guy’s eyes out. I would never recognize him…

    • The_anniebanannie

      LOL

  • lukuj

    No one else should be forced to pay, by way of tax money, for the bad decisions these people make about tatoos. They need to live with their choices and, who knows, maybe it will even be a lesson to others that they shouldn’t make the same bad choices. I suspect most of the people with the obnoxious tattoos were warned along the way that they could effect who, if anyone would hire them and for what kind of jobs. They didn’t care. They had to express themselves or thought they looked tough. So live with it! No sympathy here. If Maher wants those tattoos removed, he can donate money to have it done.

  • alpha_male

    Since Bill Maher’s such a charitable guy, I would suggest he not even pay to have the tattoos removed. He just hire the guy as is as her personal financial advisor with full control over his savings & future earning.

    It’s about investing in the future Bill!

  • zelda

    So start a charity, Bill. Put on your big boy pants and stop demanding Nanny do everything for you. A real libertarian accepts that there are consequences for actions and doesn’t look to the government to remedy individuals’ mistakes.

  • kingfish

    I can’t imagine why DC keep publishing stories about Bill Maher. He was an idiot back during the Clinton presidency and he’s STILL an idiot. Back then, along with Lanny Davis and Susan Ethridge on every TV channel, he defended ALL of Bill Clinton numerous crimes including multiple rapes, ChinaMissileGiveawayGate, TrooperGate, FBIFileGate, TravelGate, WhitehouseBedroomGate, ChinafundraisingGate, WhitewaterGate, MonicaGate, PaulaGate, GeniferFlowersGate, Hillary’s whitehousefurnitureGate and all the other “gates” during their 8 years in the White House — on and on without END. If I never see Maher’s face again, that would be FINE with me! I don’t think the country could “TAKE” another 8 years of that overwhelming criminality by BOTH CLINTONS, but then who knows — everything since then has come close to equaling it! The Bush/Clinton criminal cabal is still going strong with puppet Obama dancing along.

    • jonavark

      exactly.