Opinion

Strange bedfellows: Skilling v. United States

Stephen Richer Law Student, University of Chicago
Font Size:

Houston is one of my favorite cities—I have relatives there, one of whom is a petroleum engineer; the city has the best barbeque in the world, and some of my favorite baseball memories come from Astros games at the former Enron Field. As such, it’s no surprise that I don’t like Jeff Skilling, one of the principle culprits of the Enron collapse and the subsequent economic downturn of Houston.

Nevertheless, I spent Monday morning rooting for team Skilling as the Supreme Court heard the oral arguments for Skilling v. United States. According to the brief filed by the O’Melveny & Myers attorneys that represent Skilling, the case pivots on two issues. One was whether Skilling received a fair trial. Should the jury screening process have been more intense? Should the case been have been heard in a different city altogether? And the second issue is whether one of the statutes under which Skilling was prosecuted—the Honest Services Fraud statute—is unconstitutionally vague.

It is this second point that elicited my support. The Honest Services Fraud statute refers to the 1988 addition to the mail- and wire-fraud statute: “For the purposes of this chapter, the term, scheme or artifice to defraud includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.”

According to Shana Regon of the National Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers, “The Honest Services Fraud statute is only 28 words and no one knows what it means.” And Noel Fancisco of Jones Day claimed at a recent legal conference that the statute seems to have come out of Soviet Russia because it’s a catchall law that allows anyone to be prosecuted.

These points really hit home when I learned that even I, a law-respecting, patriotic American, could be prosecuted under the statute for simply spending a few minutes of my workday to check my e-mail, look up NBA stats, or listen to pop-singer Ke$ha’s new song “Tik Tok.” After all, by doing so, I would be depriving my employer of my full services.

I doubt that our legal system would waste its time with my hypothetical violation, but just the fact that it could is upsetting to many, including me. And this is why the Supreme Court has heard three cases in the past months on the statute: United States v. Conrad Black, Weyrauch v. United States, and today’s Skilling case.

Prior to today, a constitutional overturn of the statute looked promising. Last Friday, The Federalist Society hosted a press conference at which Tim O’Toole of Miller & Chevalier said he “can’t count a single vote that the government is going to get,” but if it were to get one, then it would be Justice Stevens. And Bill Otis, a professor at George Mason Law School thought that the statute would either be ruled unconstitutional or would be restricted to bribes and kickbacks.

Accordingly, I predicted an 8-to-1 ruling at fantasyscotus.net, looked forward to the demise of the Honest Services Fraud statute, and rested easy knowing that Skilling would still serve 20-plus years, even without Honest Services violations against him. Win-win-win.

Unfortunately, instead of launching into a relentless assault of the statute, the court spent most of its time addressing the partiality of the jury. According to Cato Institute Senior Fellow Ilya Shapiro, “Justice Breyer read extensively from the trial record to express his concern about the inadequate measures the Houston court had taken to properly remove biased jurors.” The Court touched upon the Honest Services Fraud statute, but far more important were comparisons to the jury bias in the trial of Oklahoma City bomber, Timothy McVeigh, and whether it was possible for an entire city (in this case, 4.5 million people) to be biased.

This shift in emphasis reflects a growing trend of the Roberts court to sidestep main constitutional issues. But not all is lost, coupled with the Black and Weyrauch cases, the Court has dedicated significant time to the statute—enough to warrant its unconstitutionality (as it should).

Stephen Richer is the Director of Outreach at a Washington, D.C.-based legal think tank.


PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel